Green roofs can make commercial buildings more sustainable, efficient and appealing places to work – but they can also be difficult to maintain, costly and underutilised, a property expert warns.
Colliers International director of strategic consulting Chris Farhi said green roofs were becoming more common in Europe and the United States, but have yet to become widespread in New Zealand.
The two main types of green roofs are either covered in plant life or solar panels.
Solar green roofs use arrays of solar panels to produce clean energy, which helps to cut energy costs and makes buildings more sustainable.
Living green roofs consist of plants growing on soil on a waterproof membrane. They can help to offset carbon emissions, reduce stormwater runoff, and insulate the building, thus saving power.
Farhi said while the appeal is obvious, it was important for building owners and occupiers to understand both the potential benefits and pitfalls before installing a green roof on a new or existing building.
“Green roofs can make commercial buildings more efficient and environmentally friendly, and are potent visual symbols of sustainability,” he said.
“On the other hand, green roofs can introduce hidden costs that could end up outweighing the benefits.
Farhi said commercial property owners and occupiers needed to look past the “feel good” factor and consider their options before making a significant investment that could cost them in the long-run.
He said that as solar panel technology progresses, they become a safer bet.
“Solar panels are getting cheaper to buy and install, and their modular nature can make them relatively straightforward to repair or replace.
“Improvements in battery technology have made it possible to store unused solar energy for later use, while building owners can also feed excess electricity into the grid for a profit.”
Farhi said while living green roofs have much more visual appeal, they could also be more troublesome.
“First, you need a strong roof due to the sheer weight of the system.”
This could more easily be factored into a new building’s design, but could be costly or prohibitive if you’re retrofitting an existing building, he said.
“The second potential issue is weather-tightness. Damage to even a small area of the waterproof membrane could allow water to seep into the building over time, leading to very costly repairs.”
“This is particularly troublesome in New Zealand where weathertightness issues have a major stigma.”
Unforeseen work could also be costly.
Recent changes to regulations around building anchor points for abseiling, could be more difficult to adjust to with a green roof.
A green roof, with its complex waterproof membrane, could create major issues if you needed to penetrate the underlying membrane to install new anchor points, Farhi said.
Farhi says New Zealand’s climate could also influence the types of plants can grow on living roofs.
“Some areas in the United States have dryer climates which can provide a more stable environment for the roofs.”
New Zealand’s climate is temperate, and volatile in terms of heat, moisture and wind.
“This could mean that instead of lush plants we need to use less attractive but hardier plants.”
The NZI office building in Auckland has a variety of sedum and succulent plants planted on its roof to minimise runoff and absorb 1.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere each year.
The planting won the building extra points towards its five star Green Star NZ rating for its green building design from the NZGBC in the innovation category.
Farhi said green roofs can make an attractive work space, social space, or encourage employees to collaborate on a company garden.
“In reality, however, access to green roofs can often be challenging – whether it’s due to awkward design, health and safety considerations, or a management decision to make the space available only for client functions.”
Farhi said it might be more cost-effective and practical to install planters on existing decks.
“This would bring some of the environmental and social benefits of a living roof – albeit on a much smaller scale – and free up the roof for a solar installation instead.
Julie Iles / Stuff